This is actually Mexico. Photographing Mexico from Texas isn’t something I really thought about before.
I’ve never been to a Mexican border town, and I still haven’t because they closed the legal crossings in Big Bend National Park. Up until a few years ago visitors to the park could cross over and visit the villages on the other side of the Rio Grande, buy some trinkets, and come back again. But that is no more. I’m sure some people still do, but given that we are Canadian we didn’t want to take any chances on not being allowed back into the USA. It would be a long way home by boat!
I made this image on the same evening as the one I showed in yesterday’s post. The clouds were incredible.
From this direction, the Rio Grande circles around in front of the hill I was standing on and at the time I thought the river was an important feature in the image. But looking at it afterwards I wonder you can really tell it’s a river at all. Is there too much going on in the foreground?
I tried another version cropping out the river and I also cloned out some trees that ended up on the bottom border right in the middle.
What do you think? Cropped or un-cropped?
Michael Lawson says
After viewing both images larger, I would say the original uncropped image is far more engaging. It was the difference of “oh look, pretty clouds over a hill” in the cropped version to “wow, awesome clouds in that scene, wish I was there” for me.
These photos are amazingly beautiful! I love the site as well as the color of the sky, mountain and the land. I know photos like this can only be taken by a professional photographer like you.
Russ Bishop says
The clouds are definitely eye-catching either way Anne, but in the original version the river adds a nice balance to the scene.
Len Saltiel says
Just stunning color amid the great landscape Anne. You keep showing me places that I need to visit!
Marc Perkins says
I’ll be contrarian and say that I like the cropped one better. I agree that the river does add depth and balance, but I find the scrub around the river to be quite distracting.
But both are quite fun to look at 🙂
Peter Lewicki says
My vote is with the uncropped. When you think of this geographic area you often think huge, wide open spaces. The foreground in the uncropped versionI think better evokes the vastness.
Also, in the uncropped version the buildings become more remote, more isolated, in turn contributing to the feeling of wide open spaces.
Tamera James says
I like the uncropped original best.
And I agree with Marc, partly because of the distraction of the scrub, partly because of the “rule” of thirds. The cropped version, in my opinion, offers more visual balance with the horizon cutting across the bottom third of the frame. In the uncropped version, the river is at the very edge of the frame and the horizon is in the center.
Regardless, it is a beautiful capture and location. Viva Mexico.
Curt Fleenor says
Those clouds are just incredible! As for cropped/uncropped, for me the cropped version works better. The river does seem to be crowded a bit at the bottom of the frame and the scrub does seem to distract the eye from that beautiful sky.
Richard Wong says
I think the top image tells a better story though the crop might be better compositionally.
Given the drug war problems in Mexico these days I think it’s probably a good thing you didn’t go over. Just not worth it.
Vern Snow says
Un-Cropped for me. With the river in the image it leads my eye further into the image. Cropped, my eye starts at the sky color.
Besides your question I think it is important to include , of course if possible, something strong in the forground. This makes the image realy strong. And I am convinced you tried a vertical version too. The sky is so powerful….
Uncropped. For me, it accentuates the vast open feel of the place. Thanks A., Still wish I was you…
fotoeins | Henry says
I liked seeing the horizontal aspect of the clouds at the top of the frame as well as the river cutting horizontally at the bottom of the frame.
Beautiful light, Anne!
I like the uncropped one better. I think it has more interest and depth.
Michael Russell says
I can see why you pondered this one. I do think the uncropped version is stronger. The uncropped foreground puts the rest of the scene in context for me – at least the rest of the foreground.
I really found this post interesting! I’ll be pinning this on pinterest!
John Nandor says
Very nice scene Anne! I would go with the uncropped… I tend to be subconsciously drawn to images that almost invisibly apply the rule of thirds, and the uncropped one definitely delivers 🙂
Great shot Anne! for me the uncropped version works better. Thanks for sharing this to us and i’m looking for on your next post!
I think the original one is much better than the cropped one. You can see the full details of the picture. Nice shot!
Zachary Allen Pilz says
OK. My vote is on the uncropped. I do agree with Steve regarding the rule of thirds and the brush in the front could be distracting. However, I believe the uncropped one seems to have more depth and puts the viewer into the broader context of the scenery. Either way beautiful picture and that is not just because of the saturation of color. I do like the thought of taking pictures accross borders and from accross an invisible line. I think there is definitely something to this idea. Thanks for sharing.